Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 29.06.2025 02:44

Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
What habits do happy couples have?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Has anyone ever had sex with their cousin? How did it start, and would you do it again?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
What’s next?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Magic Johnson Bluntly Blames Two Players for Knicks' Season-Ending Loss - Sports Illustrated
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
James Webb Space Telescope unveils fiery origins of a distant, hellish exoplanet - Space
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Thank you.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Exclusive | New York to Build One of First U.S. Nuclear-Power Plants in Generation - WSJ
Russia can stop this any time.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending ATACMS is WW3.